-
“Normally they are held up as examples of extreme faith. They have even had WatchTower articles about them 'glorifying' their steadfast choice.”
Simon,
I disagree with that assessment. In medical journal article upon medical journal article Watchtower has relentlessly had its representatives hammer home a notion that it’s difficult to say when a patient died from lack of blood.
For consumption in the JW community Watchtower goes so far as to quote physicians out of context to drive home a point that blood refusal is not a substantial factor of mortality among JWs.
From Watchtower’s NO BLOOD--Medicine Meets the Challenge video, 2001:
- “Dr. Aryeh Shander: "To say that one has died because of refusal of blood, I think, is a very general, misleading statement."
- "Dr. Peter Carmel: "It's rarely, if ever, the case that a patient refused a blood transfusion and therefore died."
This kind of downplaying lessens the opportunity for JWs to understand what is happening when members die in the presence of a blood refusal.
Only when the reason for a given death is undeniably the result of refusing blood is a death held up as an example of faith. They do this in these cases because they have no other choice. So they use the event to whip up a faith-based enthusiasm.
Marvin Shilmer